From: Supporters [supportersifadu.co.uk]
Sent: 06 April 2006 09:52
To: 'ifadefenceuniondomeus.co.uk'
Cc: 'Simon Bain'
Subject: Split-cap ‘compensation’ going to those who made millions
Is this the
'unfair justice' that John Tiner described? http://tinyurl.co.uk/cq0a Yes
he does have a 'Big Stick' but he should be accountable to someone who knows a
little more than he does about financial services products, that could be
anyone with a basic Financial Planning Certificate! Does he have any FS
qualifications? His staff don't appear to think they need any http://www.leviathanlaidbare.co.uk
even if the rest of us do...
Claimants can
choose when they complain, the timing of the claim can result in a hefty
profit if they stick with the contract and don't panic when the regulator runs
round in circles waving its arms screaming for compensation to be paid because
it is suffering from yet another bout of short term selective memory
syndrome. http://www.ifadu.co.uk/downloads/Letterto%20FT.pdf
The same
principle applies to mortgage endowments, bonds, pensions etc. But don't
forget about the built-in shortfalls created by the providers who slavishly
(or cunningly) used LAUTRO 'assumed expenses' in illustrations for
products sold between April 1988 and January 1995 (or even
later!). Because of this there are millions of policies which will not
meet the reasonable expectations of those who were sold them in good faith. http://www.ifadu.co.uk/downloads/FOI0002.pdf
If only we could
inject some common sense into the veins of this one-eyed 'Leviathan at Large' http://www.cps.org.uk/pdf/pub/35.pdf,
if only it would stop and think before reacting badly to the hysterical
wailing of those who purport to protect the 'consumer' http://www.notwhich.co.uk
but do the just opposite out of ignorance of the financial system. A case in
point is the 'Pensions Review' which caused so much hardship among consumers
and advisers alike, all this was based on the assumption that final salary
pension scheme benefits were in some way guaranteed when we all knew they were
nothing of the sort, unless you happen to be an MP or a Judge of course,
the very same people who bailed out of Equitable Life while they actively
discouraged advisers to save other policyholders from losing their shirts as
did the 'grannies' who lost theirs on the railways.
It's sad to see
UK PLC in such a state of fear, a fear of advising the 'consumer' only to have
the Leviathan put on its rose-tinted 100% hindsight goggles at a specific
point in time when the maximum level of compensation can be extracted, it then
sits back and admires its work while dreaming up more scams so that it can
fine more firms to replenish its coffers after spending an incredible amount
on 'educating' the consumer while failing to avoid a CCJ for £425. http://www.ifadu.co.uk/downloads/FSACCJ.pdf
It it wasn't so
true then nobody would believe it wasn't a 'Carry on' film from the good old
days entitled 'Strangulation by Regulation' with one 'Big Chief' wielding a
'Big Stick' upon a tribe of 'Insurance Salesmen' who face extinction simply
because the Chief doesn't understand what they actually sell and refuses to
consider that they might actually be doing a good job.
It is a fact that
after two decades of rules and regulations the people who are strangling the
system appear to have learned nothing, if they do in fact know what they are
doing then they should be ashamed of themselves.
Evan Owen
The IFA Defence Union
"Most
regulators’ careers end prematurely in failure and disgrace."
HOWARD DAVIES : HENRY THORNTON LECTURE : CITY UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL : 4
NOVEMBER 1998
Oppression
can only survive through silence: Carmen
de Monteflores
"Idealism increases in direct proportion to one's distance from
the problem"
- John Galsworthy